Madeline Rivera, CSC Docket No. 2020-1403
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 12, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-1403: examination eligibility, granted. Madeline Rivera appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Management Assista
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 12, 2020
Madeline Rivera appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Management Assistant (PS9731P), State Police.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- February 12, 2020, item B-15
- Outcome
- Granted
- Employer
- Law and Public Safety
- Examination
- PS9731P
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-015 02-12-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundMadeline Rivera appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Management Assistant (PS9731P), State Police.
The education requirements for the subject examination was possession of a Bachelor’s degree. The experience requirements were one year of experience performing complex administrative support work which must have included the interpretation, verification and/or application of department/agency rules, regulations, policies and procedures. Applicants who did not possess the required education could substitute additional experience on a year for year basis with 30 semester hours being equal to one year of experience. The requirements needed to be met by the May 21, 2019 closing date. A total of three employees applied for the subject examination and one was found eligible. The one eligible was appointed on certification PS191533. The list expires on November 6, 2022.
On the appellant’s application, she indicated that she possessed a high school diploma and no college credits. Personnel records indicate that she was provisionally serving in the subject title from August 2018 to the May 21, 2019 closing date, a Senior Clerk Typist from June 2005 to August 2018, a Clerk Typist from August 2004 to June 2005, a Senior Clerk Typist from April 2004 to August 2004, and a Principal Clerk Transcriber from December 2003 to April 2004. Agency Services credited her with 10 months of experience based on her provisional service in the subject title, but determined, per the substitution clause for education, that she lacked four years and two months of experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant argues that she has performed applicable out-of- title duties for 13 years. She further supplies a letter from the appointing authority verifying she has performed applicable out-of-title duties since June 2006.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(c) provides that, except when permitted for good cause, applicants for promotional examinations with open-competitive requirements may not use experience gained as a result of out-of-title work to satisfy the requirements for admittance to the examination or for credit in the examination process.
AnalysisThe record demonstrates that the appellant performed applicable out-of-title duties as a Senior Clerk Typist, as the appellant describes in detail how she performed the required duties in this title and the appointing authority confirms that she was performing the applicable duties in this title since June 2006 due to business necessity. Moreover, the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the subject title and the eligible list is incomplete as it currently contains no names. Accordingly, in this matter, the Civil Service Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(c) to accept the appellant’s out-of-title work experience for eligibility purposes only, and admit her to the examination.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and Madeline Rivera’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.