NJ Civil Service Navigator

WALIK LOGAN, CSC Docket No. 2021-1798

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 1, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1798: examination eligibility, granted. Walik Logan appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Institutional Trade Ins

Commission decisions · Meeting of September 1, 2021

Walik Logan appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Institutional Trade Instructor 1, Cooking (PS3965I), East Jersey State Prison.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
September 1, 2021, item B-28
Outcome
Granted
Title
INSTITUTIONAL TRADE INSTRUCTOR 1 COOKING
Employer
Corrections
Examination
PS3965I
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-028 09-01-21 EG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundWalik Logan appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Institutional Trade Instructor 1, Cooking (PS3965I), East Jersey State Prison.

The subject examination had an October 21, 2020 closing date. The experience requirements were two years of experience in the areas of food preparation and processing including but not limited to cooking, baking, meat cutting, pot washing, dishwashing, and the serving of food in a commercial or institutional kitchen. A total of two applicants applied and one was found eligible. Certification PS210583 was issued and its disposition is due August 30, 2021. The list expires on May 26, 2024.

On the appellant’s application, he indicated that he was provisionally serving in the subject title from January 2020 to August 2020,1 an Assistant Family Service Worker 3 from September 2010 to the January 2020, a 25 hour per week Grill Cook from September 2016 to September 2017, a per diem cook in 2016 for The Bethwood Catering Hall, a Senior Youth Worker from December 2008 to September 2010, a

1 Although October 21, 2020 was the subject examination closing date, the appellant only indicated on his application that he was working in the subject title until August 2020.

Youth Worker from June 2005 to December 2008, and a Food Service Worker2 for the Essex County Juvenile Detention Center from January 2001 to July 2007. Agency Services credited the appellant with having one year and seven months of experience based on his provisional service in the subject title (eight months), his pro-rated Grill Cook experience (10 months), and his per-diem cook experience (one month as the actual months were not listed), but determined that he lacked five months of applicable experience.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant describes how he performed the applicable duties as a Cook for seven years for the Essex County Juvenile Detention Center. He also presents his experience as a Grill Cook, his Associate’s degree in Culinary Arts, and that he has been provisionally serving in the subject title for over 17 months.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purpose of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b) provides that the appellant has the burden of proof in examination appeals.

AnalysisIn this matter, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was not eligible for the subject title as although the appellant indicated that he performed applicable duties as a Food Service Worker, applicable duties in this title are out-of- title, and confirmation of the required out-of-title duties by the appointing authority at the time has not been presented. However, the list is incomplete as there is only one name on the list. Further, personnel records indicate that the appellant continues to provisionally serve in the subject title and has gained the required experience after the closing date. The Commission notes that the dual purpose of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State and local governments and to provide appointment and advancement opportunities to Civil Service employees based on their merit and abilities. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998). Therefore, the Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) and accept the appellant’s experience gained after the closing date, for eligibility purposes only, and admit him to the subject examination.

2 The appellant’s application stated that he was a Cook 1 from 2000 to 2007, but personnel records indicate that he was a Food Service Worker from January 2001 to July 2007. Further, although the appellant’s application indicated that he was performing the required duties in this position, the required duties are out-of-title for a Food Service Worker. Further, the appointing authority was unable to receive confirmation from the Essex County Juvenile Detention Center that the appellant was performing the applicable out-of-title duties. Therefore, Agency Services was unable to credit the appellant for his experience in this position.

This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.