Victor Babecki, CSC Docket No. 2021-1925
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of August 4, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1925: examination eligibility, granted. Victor Babecki appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Supervisor of Postal Se
Commission decisions · Meeting of August 4, 2021
Victor Babecki appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Supervisor of Postal Services (PS4187I), Department of Corrections.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- August 4, 2021, item B-22
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- SUPERVISOR OF POSTAL SERVICES
- Employer
- Corrections
- Examination
- PS4187I
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-022 08-04-21.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundVictor Babecki appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Supervisor of Postal Services (PS4187I), Department of Corrections.
The subject examination’s closing date was December 21, 2020. The experience requirements were five years of experience in the operation of a large mailing section which shall have included three years of experience in a supervisory capacity with the responsibility for the maintenance of records and accounts. The appellant was the only applicant, and the examination was cancelled due to a lack of qualified candidates.
On the appellant’s application, he indicated that he was provisionally serving in the subject title from August 2019 to the December 21, 2020 closing date. He provided no further positions. Personnel records indicate that the appellant was provisionally serving in the subject title from August 2019 to the subject examination closing date, an Institutional Trade Instructor 2, Warehousing from December 2012 to August 2019, an Institutional Trade Instructor 1, Warehousing from August 2007 to December 2012, a Storekeeper 2 from March 2006 to August 2007, and a Clerk Driver from April 2005 to March 2006. Agency Services credited the appellant with one year and five months of experience, but determined that the appellant lacked three years and seven months of experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant presents that he has 16 years of experience with the appointing authority. He states that he has 14 years of experience as an Institutional Trade Instructor 2. The appellant submits his resume to describe his experience in more detail. Further, the Supervising Administrative Analyst for the Office of Financial Management describes how the appellant performed the required duties while serving an Institutional Trade Instructor 2.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an applicant may amend a previously submitted application only prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was not eligible as he only presented his provisional service in the subject title on his application and he did not submit a resume. However, on appeal, the appellant describes how he performed the required duties as an Institutional Training Instructor 2, Warehousing1 and the Supervising Administrative Analyst for the Office of Financial Management confirmed that the appellant performed the required duties for sufficient time while serving in this title. Although N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) proscribes the amendment of an application after the closing date set in the announcement, the circumstances present in this matter provide good cause to permit the appellant to amend his application. Specifically, the examination was cancelled due to a lack of qualified candidates and the appellant continues to successful serve in the subject title. Further, the Commission notes that the dual purpose of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State and local governments and to provide appointment and advancement opportunities to Civil Service employees based on their merit and abilities. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998). In this regard, the Commission finds that the appellant has demonstrated that he has the required experience for the subject title by the closing date, which, based on the circumstances presented, warrants his admission to the subject examination. Accordingly, good cause is established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) and admit the appellant.
1 Even if the required duties are out of title for an Institutional Training Instructor 2, Warehousing, the appellant’s supervisor confirmed that he was performing the required duties in this title. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(c).
The Commission cautions the appellant that, in the future, he should ensure that any applications are fully and completely filled out as his failure to do so will be cause for rejection from the selection process. This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, the cancellation of the examination announcement be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.