Joann Williams, CSC Docket No. 2022-1599
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 18, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-1599: examination eligibility, granted. Joann Williams appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirement for the promotional examination for Supervisor, Food Service
Commission decisions · Meeting of May 18, 2022
Joann Williams appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirement for the promotional examination for Supervisor, Food Service Area Operations (PS2973H), Department of Health.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- May 18, 2022, item B-30
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- SUPERVISOR FOOD SERVICE AREA OPERATIONS
- Employer
- Health and Senior Services
- Examination
- PS2973H
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-030 5-18-22 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundJoann Williams appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the experience requirement for the promotional examination for Supervisor, Food Service Area Operations (PS2973H), Department of Health.
The subject examination was open to applicants who possessed two years of experience in general kitchen work including the preparation of light meals by the August 23, 2021, closing date. A total of 14 applicants applied for the subject examination and nine were determined eligible. The list promulgated on December 30, 2021, with an expiration date of December 29, 2024. Two certifications were issued (PS220055 and PS220323), and three appointments have been made.
A review of the appellant’s application and resume reveals that she provisionally served in the subject title from May 2019 to the August 2021 closing date. Agency Services did not find any of the appellant’s experience applicable, as she did not adequately describe her experience on her application. Accordingly, Agency Services determined that the appellant was ineligible for the subject examination, as she lacked two years of experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant maintains that he is qualified for the examination, and she provides clarification of her duties on appeal. Specifically, the appellant states that her duties include supervising employees; preparing food; maintaining food safety; overseeing food storage; serving food and beverages; cleaning food service areas; assuring a safe dining environment; assuring cleanliness of food preparation areas; monitoring temperature of refrigerators; ordering supplies; completing logs; submitting required documents; and completing training.
BackgroundOfficial personnel records indicate that the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the subject title.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. Under N.J.A.C. 4A:4- 2.1(g), the Civil Service Commission (Commission) can accept clarifying information in eligibility appeals.
AnalysisInitially, Agency Services properly did not credit the appellant with any applicable experience based on what was presented in her application. However, the appellant provides clarifying information on appeal with respect to her duties as a provisional in the subject title. Based on this clarification, the Commission is satisfied that such experience satisfies the announced requirements. In this regard, that experience involved general kitchen work including the preparation of light meals. Under these circumstances, the appellant should be admitted to the examination. However, the appellant is cautioned to completely and properly fill out any future applications. Failure to do so may result in her rejection from the examination process.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.