Tonin Berisha, CSC Docket No. 2022-839
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of November 17, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2022-839: examination eligibility, granted. Tonin Berisha appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirement for the promotional examination for Road Repairer 3 (PM3338
Commission decisions · Meeting of November 17, 2021
Tonin Berisha appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirement for the promotional examination for Road Repairer 3 (PM3338C), Borough of Fairview.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- November 17, 2021, item B-16
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- ROAD REPAIRER 3
- Employer
- Fairview
- Examination
- PM3338C
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-016 11-17-21 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundTonin Berisha appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirement for the promotional examination for Road Repairer 3 (PM3338C), Borough of Fairview.
The subject examination was announced with specific requirements that had to be met as of the June 21, 2021 closing date. The requirements were three years of experience in the construction, repair, and maintenance of roads or streets which may include work involving the installation and/or maintenance of traffic lines and signs. The examination was cancelled on October 14, 2021 as the appellant, the only applicant for the examination, was found ineligible for the examination.
A review of the appellant’s application and resume reveals that he served provisionally in the subject title from February 17, 2021 to the closing date, as a Truck Driver from August 14, 2018 to February 17, 2021, as a Laborer 1 from October 8, 2011 to August 14, 2018, and from November 13, 1995 to January 5, 1998, and as a Laborer, Heavy from March 26, 2007 to October 8, 2011. Agency Services credited the appellant with four months of applicable experience for his provisional service in the subject title. However, it did not find any of his other experience applicable. Accordingly, Agency Services determined that the appellant was ineligible for the subject examination as he lacked two years and six months of applicable experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant maintains that he is eligible for the examination, and has been performing work as a Road Repairer 3 since October 2011. In support, he submits a letter from the Administrator/Borough Clerk, who confirms that the appellant’s duties since 2011 included work in overseeing road crews, undertaking road repairs including the maintenance and patching of roads, installation of traffic signs, painting traffic lines, overseeing the cleaning and repairing of catch basins and drain pipes, overseeing salting and snowplowing of borough roads, and completing minor repairs to trucks.
BackgroundOfficial personnel records indicate that the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the subject title.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) provides that a rule may be relaxed for good cause in a particular situation. Initially, it is noted that Agency Services correctly credited the appellant with four months of applicable experience for his provisional service in the subject title. The appointing authority confirms in this matter that the appellant has been performing the applicable duties of the subject title since 2011. As such, the Civil Service Commission is satisfied that the appellant also performed sufficient applicable duties while serving as a Truck Driver, Laborer 1, and as a Laborer, Heavy, notwithstanding that such applicable duties did not constitute the primary focus of his position. Additionally, the Commission notes that the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title under test and has accrued an additional five months of applicable experience. Moreover, the examination has been cancelled and there are no other applicants. Under these circumstances, with the inclusion of his experience as described by the appointing authority and his provisional experience gained after the closing date, he should be admitted to the examination.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the cancellation of the examination be rescinded and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.