Eric Glassman, CSC Docket No. 2025-2267
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 2, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2025-2267: examination eligibility, denied. Eric Glassman appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the requirements for the Fire Captain (PM1916G), Camden promotional examination.
Commission decisions · Meeting of July 2, 2025
Eric Glassman appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the requirements for the Fire Captain (PM1916G), Camden promotional examination.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- July 2, 2025, item B-3
- Outcome
- Denied
- Title
- FIRE CAPTAIN
- Examination
- PM1916G
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundEric Glassman appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the continuous permanent service requirement for the Fire Captain (PM1916G), Camden promotional examination.
The closing date of the examination was April 30, 2025. The examination was open to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of three years of continuous permanent services as of the closing date and were currently serving as a Fire Fighter. At the time the appellant’s application was evaluated, personnel records indicated that the appellant was a Gloucester City Fire Fighter from February 26, 2018, to January 17, 2024, when he resigned in good standing. Thereafter, the appellant was appointed as a Camden Fire Fighter on January 29, 2024, from an open competitive examination. Based on the appellant’s starting date with Camden, Agency Services found that he lacked the required three years of permanent service as a Fire Fighter.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant presents that he started his firefighting career on February 26, 2018, as a Gloucester City Fire Fighter and worked there until January 31, 2024. Further, on January 29, 2024, he was appointed as a Camden Fire Fighter. Therefore, the appellant argues that he met the continuous permanent service requirement. He notes that Gloucester City and Camden are mutual aid departments that provide emergency fire service to each other’s communities, and the departments train together. The appellant states that he switched to Camden to continue his professional development and have greater opportunities for promotions. The appellant submits documentation from Gloucester City and Camden to demonstrate that he worked for Gloucester City and Camden during the aforementioned dates. Additionally, the appellant’s personnel records have been corrected to reflect these dates. Moreover, the appellant highlights that there is no wording on this agency’s website, paperwork, or the subject announcement that indicates that the three years of continuous permanent service requirement had to be met based only on service with Camden. He presents that the word “aggregate” means “to collect or gather into a mass or whole.”
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) requires applicants to possess all the requirements specified in an announcement for a promotional examination by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b) provides that the appellant has the burden of proof in examination appeals.
N.J.S.A. 40A:14-29 provides, in pertinent part, that in a municipality “a promotion of any member or officer of the paid or part-paid fire department or force to a superior position shall be made from the membership of such department or force. No person shall be eligible for promotion to be a superior officer unless he shall have previously served as a permanent paid fireman for at least 3 years in such department or force” (emphasis added). In this matter, per N.J.S.A. 40A:14-29, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was ineligible as the three years of required continuous permanent service as a Fire Fighter needed to be with the announcing fire department, i.e. Camden, and not just as a Fire Fighter. As this requirement is statutory, it cannot be relaxed.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.